|
May
4-10, 2003
|
Questions
|
Answers
|
|
Sat, 10 May 2003
Logic
"Constant practice devoted to one subject often outdoes both
intelligence and skill" -- Cicero
"You might prove your point with a deck of cards. Shuffle the cards and
try to guess the top three. If you miss, just practice until perfect."
-- Ed Seykota
If two players face the same challenge and no trick is used, the longest
lived will have an edge. If money is on the table, the shortest lived might
circumvent that handicap through money management (keeping bets small so
that the longest lived could not inflict much damage on him) and
probabilities play, such as increasing bets while on a winning streak and
trimming down fast while on a losing one. Yet, he will just be striving to
live long enough, to practice long enough.
Against the wise, prudence is the only effective weapon. Nonetheless, there
are no enemies. |
If
your CM does not listen to Fred, you might keep "practicing" the
same old dramas for a lifetime.
For
example, you might check your own feelings of wanting to debate, meanwhile
missing opportunities.

Debating
Team
Having
Good Fun with Arguing
Note:
Do
not pick the markets as an opponent.
Clip: www.sfsu.edu/~speech/debate.htm |
|
Sat, 10 May 2003
Managing
Outside Money
Dear Mr. Seykota,
I would like to find out the following:
1. What criteria are you looking for in a potential client?
2. What is the minimum capital required by you?
3. What is your fee structure?
Thank you for your kind attention. I look forward to hearing from you. |
You
might get to know your clients well enough to understand each other's
feelings about things like:
 |
trend
following |
 |
risk |
 |
drawdowns |

Cash
Equivalent
When
traders and clients see each other as fees and capital ... they may forget
to check each others' feelings about trading.
Clip: www.adventurepostoffice.com/
cards/money/us-stacks-l.jpg |
|
Sat, 10 May 2003
Question
on Probability
Dear Mr. Seykota,
I have recently come across an article concerning the philosophy of
probability. Two main views are discussed in this paper: 1) it is
subjective 2) objective. If one takes the view of the former, then is it not
meaningless when a person says "There's a high probability that the stock
will advance" or "This trade has a reward-to-risk ration of
2:1"? Would this not imply that most of the statistical tools used for
financial analyses are not very practical? Would appreciate your view on
this and how do you think probability should be handled when trading.
Thanks. |
You
might re-write your question in SVO-p. See Trading Tribe Process.
To
check your writing for clarity, have a 5-the grader read it and tell you if
it's any good.

Lesko
Kids
might wonder
what
in the world he's talking about.
|
|
Sat, 10 May 2003
Manhattan Tribe
Report
on their First
Meeting
Since this was our first meeting, I did spend quite a bit of time on a
tour of modern Psychology. I talked about Milton Erickson, Richard Bandler,
Hypnosis, NLP, Visualization Techniques, EMDR etc. This was followed by a
detailed overview of conscious mind (CM), sub conscious mind (Fred), what is
it that we try to do and achieve in 'The Process'.
We then went around the room and had a extensive check-in. Each member
talked about their trading metaphor and Item of concern.
Since many of the members either have long commutes or have to be at their
trading desks early in the morning, we planned a two hour meeting from 7PM -
9PM. With twenty minutes left in the meeting we decided to give 'The
Process' a try. The Process ran for over an hour, during which many members
due to time constraints had to leave.
During the process, CM put up a fierce fight. Any time I felt we saw a
glimpse of Fred, CM would quickly interject, and launch into a logical
story. After about an hour we reached the zero point, the person on the
hot seat did report that "Some of the 'links' I made where not clear
before and came up during the exercise". However no aha's.
So I think we did manage to fumble through our first meeting. As you said it
does take three to four meetings before we have the process down. We did
learn a lot, next time we just have to do a better job with SVO_P; this
mirroring and pacing does take some practice.
Our sincere thanks to you Ed for helping us with the first meeting and also
to Jason Russell of the Toronto tribe on prodding me on to do the process
despite my concerns, thanks very much !
My best advice for other groups around the world and people sitting on the
fence to start new groups is to jump right in, even if you have a couple
of members. The process does take some practice, you will learn by doing.
There is really no good way to prepare.
I also suspect that we may have some turnover in our group, doing deep
psychological work via the process may not be everyone's cup of tea. In the
end as you always say "Everyone always gets what they want, or at least
what Fred wants". |
Congratulations
!
The
work of the Trading Tribe is to follow the process. Results seem
proportional to the intention to jump into the feelings part.
As
the leader, exemplify jumping into some of your own items is an important
part of your job.
Suggestion:
examine your feelings of wanting to do it right, wanting to prepare, lecture
and understand before you jump in.

Ready
to Jump and Trying to Jump
are
not the same as jumping.
Same
goes for trading.
http://www.skydivesouthsask.com/
1979imagepages/197919.htm
|
|
Sat, 10 May 2003
Book
Dear Ed,
I read of course an interview with you in Market Wizards and from time to
time I read your FAQ answers at your site.
I am from Poland. Now I am during a transition from polish stock exchange to
forex trading. I use of course a trend following style.
I admire your FAQ answers and enjoy your sense of humor (and some pictures
you enclose to make your point). You remind me of Zen masters and their
paradoxical responses they give to students
I hope you'll soon write a book on trading. |
FAQ
seems to be trending along in that direction.

Trading
Tribe & FAQ
Life
is a book you write,
one
day at a time.
|
|
Sat, 10 May 2003
Re-Buy
Dear Ed,
I just read your response to Friday May 9 post "Where's The
party?"
Referring to where you respond "You might even try these:" and you
list 4 things to try. I love what you wrote! Nice and simple. That
could almost be an entire trading book as far as I am concerned! Well almost
...
I remember when I bought America Online in 1996 (The symbol back then was
AMER). I bought 1000 shares for about $27 per share from a long low base
after one upward move and another sideways base and a gap up. I used almost
all of my capital and no margin (That was conservative for me.).
I still remember at Christmas time and I had only owned the stock for short
time. My family laughed at me because I was at a loss in the position before
it began to really move.
I held the stock for 11 months and 21 points or a $21,000 profit. I sold it
on a day it fell 3 1/2 or 4 points on heavy volume. It was the most money I
have ever made in a single trade up to that point. I was happy. My old car
could be paid off and I could go to Southern Mexico to visit an old high
school friend.
AMER then reversed from the sell off the next day and began going up
steadily for over a year. It had 3 or four splits within months. If I had
held AMER or bought the stock back even higher than I sold it, I could have
made over $600,000 in something like 12 more months or so and something like
$2 MILLION if I had held longer! But Nooooo! How could I possibly buy a
stock sooooo High! What a [xxx] I was! The stock had 50 million shares
"How could it go up anymore?" "Smack!" I just hit myself
in the head.
I think that the term "Going Up" can confuse some traders because
then the stock or commodity is "Too High" and when something is
"Too High" it can "Fall Down". Whoa ... I am loosing
balance.
I could walk on a 20 foot long and 6 inch wide steel beam if it was 1 foot
off of the ground but if it is 1 mile in the air I would have trouble even
crawling it!
A way that has helped me buy at new highs is I imagine a field where there
are a few trees. Plants and grass could also be in the field. A few young
trees would tend to keep on growing possibly to 10, 20 or 100 feet, while
the grass can only grow a 2 or 3 feet. A tree could also get sick or fall
down but it has a better chance of "Going Up" than the grass does
after 2 or 3 feet. Buying a stock or commodity that is low or moving
sideways is like waiting for the grass to grow 30 feet high. I would rather
buy the tree.
Maybe this could help some people who don't like to buy when a stock or
commodity hits new highs.
I bought mucho of stock [yyy] 2 or 3 days ago at a new year high.
These e-mails are helping me to remember how many profits I gave up by not
re-buying certain stocks. Very simple just let go of my ego and re-buy right
or wrong.
|
Make
sure to keep your risk in line with what you can handle, so as to keep your
mind clear, your ability to re-buy intact.

One
Way to Keep the Mind Clear
Amazing
Survival Story
Man
Impaled with Banana
"It was a
horrendous hurricane. The boat was thrashing this way and that and we were
fighting for our very lives. I looked at Jessie and yelled, 'this is no time
to be eating a banana!' Then I noticed it was coming out of his forehead,
not his mouth," grimaced Imana James.
Hurricane Velma
hit in the Atlantic so quickly and with such force that all ships and boats
in the area north of Bermuda were lost, except the James' and their 41'
yellow ketch, "Nanu Nanu."
"Thought I
was ambushed, just like my namesake," said Jessie James. "I felt
this fruity felling between my eyes. Guess it's kinda like a straw going
through a telephone pole in a tornado. I yanked it out. Lucky those things
are slippery. Miraculously it didn't hit anything vital so I closed up the
holes with duct tape and we rode out the rest of the storm. Guess it was my
lucky day."
Clip:www.48north.com/apr2002/ne4.htm
|
|
Fri,
9 May 2003
Where is the Party?
Is this trend following?
I don’t have to know if a party is a party. When people are having a good
time, it’s a party. I don’t need to reason or figure it out why or what
reasons people are having a good time. I should just join and dance with
abandon and dance the night away.
1. Now, I am trying to figure out when the party is going to start. --- I
won’t have to; I will see it if whether a party is brewing.
2. I feel left out when I am not in the party; I see it happening and want
to get in but I feel “uninvited”.
This is what I feel when I see a trend. I feel uninvited/an outcast /
unwelcome. But deep down inside I know I can still have a good time dancing
for the rest of the time no matter what others think (but my conscious mind
is trying to conceptualize a past event whereas I feel uninvited / ridiculed
therefore I should not go in---the drama?).
I have an aha moment and now I invite myself to the party whenever I see
one.
I dance without inhibitions and have a great time although I didn’t catch
the whole party. I regulate myself from the punch bowl so that I can attend
another party tomorrow.
MORE…
I am having too much of these aha moments (the effect is less pronounced as
the first ones)…now I feel that my conscious mind is associating
everything in my life experiences to be somewhat related to my trading …
thoughts? I am attempting to figure out too many aha moments consciously.
--- just follow the trend of having many aha moments? |
Sounds
like the party's at your place.
Here's a party game - you act out
(with just facial expressions and body language - no talking) the following:
 | outcast |
 | unwelcome |
 | uninvited |
 | ridiculed |
 | having too many ahas |
The others try to guess which.
You might even try these:
 | buying on new highs |
 | selling on lows |
 | getting back in to a position
after you get stopped out |
 | entering orders again and again
after many whipsaws |
We do this kind of thing at Trading
Tribe meetings - after a while all the expressions look pretty much the
same.

Joy
Clip: www.dipaola.org/stanford/
facial/class6notes.html
|
|
Fri, 09 May 2003
Seeking the
Path
We were delighted and excited to find your web site.
I have read all the materials on the web site and agree to all the terms.
My wife and have I traded commodities for about 10 years.
We have been on a quest for excellence, therefor have read Tharps 5 books,
trading manuals, read his e-mails, his books, attend the Sacramento IITM
group, read almost all the books you recommend, plus lots of others
including the Wizard series
In addition we both have attended NLP classes, my wife is certified in the
version taught by Mike Grinder.
Our quest continues as we have not found the needed flow you describe.
Some uncontrollable laughter while reading the FAQ's.
We would appreciate attending the Thursday Night meetings of the tribe. Our
ignorance is infinite.
Best to you, |
Try
to dramatize to each other the feeling of wanting (to find the flow) until
it converts to aha.
When
wanting disappears, having remains.

Equipment
for the Path
Helping
Each Other Get into the Flow
http://www.centurynovelty.com/
cart/general/squirttoys/Index1.htm
|
|
Fri, 9 May 2003
Sydney Trading
Tribe
Dear Mr. Seykota,
I would like to start a trading tribe in Sydney,
Australia. Is there anything I need to do?
Also, I will be grateful if you, the founder of TradingTribe can join this
Yahoo Group.
As a regular reader of your TT FAQ, and I have to tell you how much I love
reading it, as much as I love to trade in the markets. Mr. Seykota, you are
one professional trader I really respect. Thank you very much for starting
the TradingTribe - it allows traders like me to find a place to live with,
not to be
"alone" anymore.
The more I learn about trading and the more I
experience the market, the feeling of loneliness grows - often I feel like I
am against the crowd and everybody else has different opinions about which
direction the market will go. It was when I found myself, as a trader, need
to have our very own personalities and methodologies to trade the market,
regardless of what opinions other people give. Do you agree?
Mr. Seykota, please continue your great work in the FAQ and the
TradingTribe. Words from the Master are just too valuable. Thank you.
Kind regards,
|

Welcome
Sydney
Australia!
You
are now on-line
on
the
Tribe
Directory Page.

Sydney
Map: www.expedia.com
|
|
Thu, 8 May 2003
I feel gratitude for what you are doing ... thank you.
|

Into
every songwriter's life comes a song,
the
source of which cannot be explained
by
personal experience.
- Noel Paul Stookey
|
|
Thu, 8 May 2003
Own risk
tolerance Vs Client Risk Tolerance
Dear Ed,
Just going with the flow of FAQ – and enjoying every bit. Thanks for it
all.
I am inclined to trade aggressively for my own account – often with
huge drawdowns; ( holding on to positions so long as they are in line with
their major trends ) No debilitating stomach problems yet :)
I aspire to manage money, but feel that most investors would not be
comfortable with my drawdowns. Therefore, I paper trade a portfolio of
long stocks & cash only, with very low heat and consequently low
drawdowns too – as a model to present to likely clients.
My dilemma is – should I seek clients who are more inclined to my trading
style, or offer something more acceptable to their gut? If I choose the
latter, I wonder what kind of schizophrenic repercussions might surface in
real time trading ?
Would appreciate your thoughts –
Best Regards,
|
It
might help to fully experience what your customers want, before you trade
their accounts.


Choices
Sometimes Rest
on
Comfort Levels
So Goldilocks
says, "This seat is too hard, and this seat is too soft, and this one,
the seat on the exchange, is just right." So she buys a seat on
the exchange with the Three Bears, right at the top of the market, and the
rest is history, sort of.
Clips:
http://www.churchtowninn.com/
inn-policy.htm
http://ww2.kaneso.co.jp/data/
new/0022/recyclebenti01.htm |
|
Thu, 8 May 2003
The Process
"The Trading Tribe Process is not a method for practicing trading. It
is a method for resolving drama by experiencing feelings..."
Ed:
I read about the TT Process and I see your positive intentions. Actually it
recalls me an attempt I made about one year ago through an on-line community
to keep an on-going thread to share feelings and weaknesses with other
members.
It was kind of a
"Losers and Gamblers Anonymous" thread where we would talk about
our deepest fears, feelings and weaknesses. In the process I confessed most
of my failures and dramas experienced up to then, in the early stages of my
trading.
Although I
could not get other members to take part in the thread I benefited a lot
from the experience, basically for two reasons: (1) I got in touch with
deep feelings such as fear of losing, greed, hope, etc., I was trying to
suppress unconsciously and just let them go; and (2) I got wholehearted
support from some valuable members through heartfelt sharing of experiences
and feelings (they happen to be professionals in the business).
So, I would suggest you to set up a similar page on Trading Tribe. Or,
perhaps, is this the original intent behind the FAQ pages? I will be glad to
participate.
With kind regards,
|
Your
thread and this site can assist with ID-ing some feelings.
The
AHA comes at celebrating feelings for positive intention in an
Intentional
Community.
Face
to face, people notice postures, tones and other nuances.

Joy
- Even Better in Person
Clip: www.dipaola.org/stanford/
facial/class6notes.html
|
|
Thu, 8 May 2003
Fighting the Ego
"There is a difference between knowing the path, and walking it."
- Morpheus,
the Matrix.
When walking; just walk. When trading; just trade.
Simple enough to understand; but the hardest thing to do. To take the
diamond from within the mountain of rock and polish and shape it to
crystal-clear perfection requires as much patience and persistence as it
does skill.
A wise mind fades as easily as a rainbow; whereas a foolish mind is as
difficult to rid ones self of as a vicious watchdog.
HOWEVER, when we work long and hard to glimpse of a magnificent
rainbow; we can't cling to them as the creatures on the river bottom; for in
this case, even though we have seen the full spectrum of visible light
through the refractions in both the rainbow and the diamond, we're still
stuck down on the river bottom at zero flow velocity because attachments to
these material things can not lead us to freedom from them!
Essentially what I am trying to say is this. When seeing the rainbow, just
see it, but know that it does not exist. Once we see something does not
exist; it is more difficult to become attached to it.
I began seeing the rainbow many years ago; it was very beautiful and I
became attached to it when I saw it. It hurt me when it vanished from my
sky. Years later, my sky opened up to become everybody's sky; I learned that
the rainbow; although beautiful, didn't exist, but I consistently patted
myself on the back every time I had gained a measure of intuitive insight. It
has not been until just recently that I have began to come to terms with the
fact that I neither exist, nor do I not exist.
It's a difficult process though; the ego won't give up without a fight.
It doesn't want to stop acting out the drama that it exists as a separate
entity from the infantine universal energy. On Guard Ego!
|
Celebrate
the feeling of wanting to fight the ego, and fight and ego both disappear.
Getting to the celebration point is
the work of The Trading Tribe.
See Trading Tribe Process at Going it
Alone.

Celebrate
!
Clip:
http://partysupplieshut.
makesparties.com/index.php3
|
|
Thu, 8 May 2003
I am a beginner. Which market better to trade, electronic or open outcry?
|
FAQ
does not offer instrument specific trading advice, See Ground Rules. |
|
Thu, 8 May 2003
Stock Tip
see: Assistant
Ed,
thanks for shedding some light on my friend [xxx] who claims to know you. It
makes me question his character.
Check out [yyy]
Stock. Its a little late in the game but a nice 7 month, 7 weeks chart
nonetheless. The optimal time to get in would have been in late February,
when it had that nice hook up.
The recent double
top looks like this thing is running out of gas although if it takes out
that hook down from 3 days ago one could buy in at the high of that hook
down.
Looks like one
could buy today also and place a stop at today's low as it looks like a hook
up is occurring today. But you probably already knew this.
thanks
|
Your
stock is consolidating, below new high ground.
Locate
the feeling of buying your stock. Compare with the feeling of buying others
making all-time highs.

Making
New Highs
Bet
on it going even higher.
April
7, 2001, a Delta 2 rocket lifts off from Cape Canaveral at 11:02 a.m. with
the Mars Odyssey spacecraft aboard
.
Clip: http://skydiary.com/
gallery/launch/launch.html |
|
Thu, 8 May 2003
Thanks from the
Manhattan Tribe !
Ed,
Thanks very much for your generous gift of sharing the mechanics of The
Trading Tribe Process. I notice the updated version. I plan to use it in
tonight's meeting!
Please kindly remember to call us at 7:10 PM EST.
Best Regards |

Congratulations
on
your first meeting !
|
|
Thu, 08 May 2003
Validation and Commitment 2
see: Validation
and Commitment
Mr. Seykota:
Thanks for the recommendation. I'll be picking that book up today. While I
never would have thought of my parents as "toxic", I can't argue
with the obvious: someone seeking validation is clearly someone carrying
around some drama of having been invalidated.
Thanks for posting my comments too. I hope others might find some value in
them. I know that for me, seeing my personal thoughts posted in a public
forum somehow created an atmosphere of greater objectivity that allowed me
to see things I hadn't seen before.
Just a quick update on where I ended up (so far) after all of yesterday's
"work".
I realized last night that "working your butt off" and
"commitment" are two very different animals. I've worked hard on
speech and trading. But upon reflection, I realize that every time I thought
I was making a commitment to these areas, what was actually there was
"I'm going to work really hard, I'm going to give it all I've got and
hopefully it will all work out the way I want it to."
This is more than a little different from what I decided last night. Last
night I made a real commitment. I'm going to be the trader that I've always
wanted to be, NO MATTER WHAT. I'm going to get past this speech thing NO
MATTER WHAT. There is no more doubt regarding this process. No more room for
"chance" and "hopes" that it will all work out. There is
only my DECISION to accomplish this and the firm intention to proceed from
day to day, step by step until I'm there. That's it.
I know that feelings to the contrary will arise. I will want to stop. I will
want to quit. I will wonder if I should do something else. I will wonder if
maybe I can't do this. Those feelings are free to be there, I can let
them arise and I can let them pass. THEY SAY NOTHING ABOUT MY
COMMITMENT.
Often in the evening I feel that I don't want to brush my teeth. I'd rather
just head straight for bed. But every evening I brush my teeth nonetheless,
because I have a commitment to oral hygiene and my feelings, while they
are valid and free to be there, have nothing to do with that commitment.
I aim to make my trading process, following the system, a bit like brushing
my teeth. I follow my rules, I update my data, I look over my charts in
accordance with my plan. Because I'm committed to trading successfully, not
just part time, but all the time. There are no "ifs, ands or buts"
regarding the outcome. The outcome is a foregone conclusion. I have the
system, I have the resources to trade that system, and I have the resources
to resolve whatever issues might still be in the way of my following that
system. Assuming a genuine commitment, success is then, a foregone
conclusion. There is no "haziness" here. There are no more
variables, other than the variables inherent to trading. That, I believe, is
commitment. It's not "hopefully I can pull this off", nor
"maybe I can do it if the gods look upon me favorably". It's
"This is my decision, this is what I'm doing. 'Nuff said."
Best to you, and thanks again for this great resource.
|
Yes. |
|
Thu, 8 May 2003
A Wonderful
Plan
Hi Ed,
I am a trader. There is nothing in the world that excites me more than
trading which doesn’t make my story unique, does it? Actually, it is
my husband and I, which makes two of us.
A good friend of mine introduced me to the markets about two years ago. He
set me up with a broker and “black box” system, both of which were
disastrous experiences. Nothing new either, right?
Here is where it gets better. My husband is a
psychologist / hypno-therapist who has been a serious handicapper of horse
racing and sports (football & basketball) all his life. He uses advanced
statistics and his own special psychological techniques to make his
handicapping picks. Once he learned about trading, he immediately identified
the similarities between handicapping and trading.
It allowed us
quickly develop our own trading ideas. This year I left my job as a vice
president of a public relations firm to focus on trading full time. My
husband still practices psychological counseling, mainly over the phone,
while he is not busy trading.
To expand our capital base, we are looking for a partnership with an
established trader, like yourself, where the sponsor would receive a
percentage of our profits.
We believe that only good things can happen if you reach out.
My husband would
be glad to share with you his ideas.
Who knows, they
might help you with your own trading. Feel free to give us a call at any
time or let us know if you would like to set up a special time for us to
meet. Thanks --
|
Consider
the feeling of excitement you derive from the market ... and the
trades you put on to get that excitement. See Trading Tribe Process.

Little
Lulu Stands Behind Her Man
Lulu is a rascal
who lets nothing stop her from getting what she wants. Little LuLu, little
Lulu with dimples on your chin ... always in and out of trouble, mostly
always in.
Clip: http://michelesworld.net/dmm/
lulu/comics/146.jpg
|
|
Thu, 8 May 2003
Greetings,
Thanks for creating and maintaining FAQ.
In your directory page, you state:
"In response to vigorous demand for this work, Ed is currently
preparing a training program and materials, leading to certification of
mastery and right to use the Trading Tribe name and logo"
I wish to become certified. How do I become certified?
Here in the bay area, I am a member of the San Jose Tribe. We have yet to
meet. We have very few people - two last time I checked with the local
contact.
He suggests
waiting until the group obtains more people. From your experience, how many
people do you suggest for group size at a minimum and maximum level.
Thank you for sharing and contributing the Trading Tribe Process to the
trading community.
Tom
|
A
tribe of two or three can work. See Trading Tribe Process. You might
consider the feeling of having to wait.

Stand
and Wait and Serve
- His state Is
kingly: thousands at his bidding speed, And post o'er land and ocean
without rest; They also serve who only stand and wait. -- John Milton
(1608-1674)
http://www.groundstrike.com/
limoges/dubarry/bearwaiter.htm
|
|
Thu, 8 May 2003
Feeling of
Regret
Dear Dr. Ed -
From 1996 - 1998, I worked for the two most successful Internet companies in
NYC. Yet due aggressive personality, I sabotaged myself with management
and missed out reaping the rewards of two successful IPOs. In 1998, I
was debating whether to start trading or follow my parents advice and go to
business school. I went to business school and missed out on profiting on
the bubble. Now that I am trading, I know these feeling of regret will
affect my performance (ie getting into and out of positions too quickly and
maybe in other areas I have not found yet.).
The Trading Tribe revolves around feeling these feelings and not suppressing
them and seeing where they originate from. I think I have done that.
Is there anything else that I should be doing to make sure these
feelings of regret do not sabotage my trading and life?
Thanks,
|
Seeing
where feelings originate is incidental; communicating them is central the
Trading Tribe Process.
Consider
celebrating your feeling of missing out. Likely it also occurs early
in the market cycle. Listen for it. It could be a pretty good opportunity
indicator.

Missing
the Move
After missing the train to Hogwarts, Ron and Harry have a near mishap as
they fly the Ford Anglia.
Clip: www.allmoviephoto.com/
photo/2002_harry_potter_and_
the_chamber_of_secrets_067.html
|
|
Wed, 7 May 2003
The Drama
Attenuates
Today I took a nice profit and got stopped out on another for a loss.
Strange thing is, I am totally phlegmatic on each trade. I am stoic and
indifferent.
Am I on to something here? |
Check
if your stoicism feels like suppressing, or like allowing your
feelings them to be whatever they are.

The
Parthenon (477 - 438 BC)
...
100 years later ...
Zeno
of Cittium (333 - 261 BC)
Zeno,
starts the Stoic school of philosophy in about 308 B.C. He holds that human
beings are at their best when free from passion and when they calmly accept
all occurrences as the unavoidable result of divine will, or of the natural
order.
Stoics hold that
emotions like fear or envy or passion arise from false judgments and that
the sage - a person who attains moral and intellectual perfection - does not
have them.
The Trading Tribe
holds that The Trading Tribe Process, that encourages passionate expression
from Fred to CM, is a pretty good path to freedom; suppressing feelings,
inexorably entrain drama.
More
on Zeno:
http://members.aol.com/
heraklit1/zeno.htm
http://neptune.spaceports.com/
~words/zeno.html
Clip:
http://harpy.uccs.edu/greek/athens.html
|
|
Wed, 7 May 2003
Assistant
Mr. Seykota, about a year ago I heard that you were in need of an trading
assistant.
I was just
wondering if the position is still open and if so then I would like to
apply. I live in Huntington Beach which is not far from you and I have the
series 3, 7, and 55 licenses.
I'm already
somewhat familiar with your trading style as a friend of mine have taught me
a few things. I would enjoy hearing from you.
p.s. Was that really you who signed my Market Wizards book last December
when you went to the Laker game with [my friend] or did he just sign your
name and [trick] me as usual?
|
OK,
here's your job: experience your feelings about trusting people who trick
you, as usual.
Then, become creative, successful and
productive in your career.
I can pay you, say 100% of whatever
you earn. You may start right away.

Off to Work
Don't
forget to pack a nutritious lunch.
Clip: www.reaganfoundation.org/
store/products.asp?subcat_id=67 |
|
Thu, 7 May 2003
Sitcomfusion
see Genie
in a Bottle
Elizabeth Montgomery played a Witch. Barbara Eden played a Genie. Other than
that I am enjoying your FAQ immensely.
|
Thank
you for the heads up. The item stands correctly now. |
| Wed, 7 May 2003
Looking at the Mirror
see Perseverance
The statements I share resonate with my own experiences and feelings,
especially Cicero's one (which seems to mirror the TT Process in a practical
way). |
Feelings
register in the senses and have basic components such as pressure,
temperature, texture, sound, smell, brightness, color, etc.
Thoughts, such as in your previous
send, are logical and have little sensory component.
The Trading Tribe Process is
not a method for practicing trading. It is a method for resolving
drama by experiencing feelings; the Trading Tribe Process might lead to a
change in trading style, or to another career entirely.

Thoughts
Aristotle Contemplating the Bust of Homer.

Feelings
Homer
Contemplating the Throat of Bart.
Clips:
http://www.pixelcraft.com.au/
galleries/humor/homer.html
http://home.teleport.com/
~lono/page17.html |
|
Wed, 7 May 2003
Dave and Hal
Hello Ed,
A small note about Fred, I think the take off on Fred-ian Model is very
cleaver.
My thoughts are that when I think of Fred I think of the Friday the 13th
horror movies, the character Fred or Freddy!
What do you think of naming the subconscious Hal? from the Stanley Kubrick
classic movie 2001: A Space odyssey. Based on the novel by the famed Arthur
Clark.
So 'Hal' would be the sub conscious mind and 'Dave' would be the conscious
mind.
There are many similarities between Hal - Dave and the conscious -
subconscious model.
Hal as a computer
is always running in the background, carrying on the tasks to maintain the
space ship (human body). Hal however also has its own mission, a mission
that he keeps away from the human or the conscious mind - Dave.
Just a thought !
I think Hal-Dave-2001:Space odyssey theme is slightly better for marketing
purposes.
Space odyssey - a journey within. a sort of William Blake theme..... |
HAL
seems calculatingly adversarial. Dave eventually lobotomizes HAL.
Fred
and the Conscious Mind (CM) typically cooperate to common benefit.
Sometimes Fred arranges drama to get CM's attention.

HAL
ICU
with my CPU
Dave:
HAL, I won't argue with you anymore. Open the door!
HAL: Dave, this conversation can serve no purpose anymore.
Goodbye.
http://www.strafe.com/2001/ |
|
Wed, 07 May 2003
Fred
Hi Ed
In the Structure of The Mind is Fred always right?
"Modern
society teaches us to suppress our feelings". Fred feed himself thru
experiences that involve other Fred's.
Are Fred and his
colleague's part of the society?.
I thank you for all the above
Regards
|
Fred
does not deal in right and wrong. Conscious Mind does. See The Trading Tribe
Process.
Your
Fred communicates with other Freds with subtle expressions and postures and
tones. Fred can enrol other Freds in staging attention grabbing dramas.

Juggling
Knives on a High Wire
Sometimes
trading takes unnecessary risks in front of an audience.
http://mailer.fsu.edu/
~mpeters/groundacts.html
|
|
Wed,
07 May 2003
Validation and Commitment
Mr. Seykota:
I was very happy to discover your "Trading Tribe" and have been
reading the comments closely. Lately I've been writing down a lot of my
thoughts about trading. I decided to take a week to explore my thoughts
and feelings about trading in depth. I want to get clear on my relationship
to trading before putting on any more trades.
Anyway, I started to write the following this morning and thought I'd send
it your way. I think I'm hitting on something in here, but was hoping to get
your thoughts on it as you seem to have a great ability to cut through the
BS and get to the heart of the matter. (Or maybe I'm just trying to get some
validation?!)
Thanks
for the website and your willingness to share your time and insights!
-----
I find myself trying to come up with a question or insight that I can send
to Ed, hoping that he'll "tap me on the shoulder" and validate me,
like "You've got it! You're destined to be great!" I have often
found myself hoping that some "authority" is going to "see
something in me" and validate my goals. I mean, if only a
"market wizard" would see something in me, then I'd know I can do
it!
(I'm embarrassed to admit that I have some need to be "great",
to be recognized for my "greatness", all the while recognizing
that the need likely stems from just the opposite. In other words, trying to
prove that I'm great because I fear that in fact I'm nothing but.)
I extend that to wonder if I'm seeking some kind of validation from the
market? Like I need to put on a great trade to "prove" to
myself that I can succeed, that I'm cut out for this. It's almost like
"if I get good results, that will prove that I can win at this game.
Whereas if I get poor results, it means I can't."
In writing that I notice that I feel that MY RESULTS DEFINE ME, or at
least my potential. If I win I'm good and I can succeed, if I lose there's
something wrong with me and I can't do this thing.
I'm
looking at the market to tell me who I am, to tell me what I can and can't
do! WOW, what a tough game to play! Trading with money is challenging
enough, but trading my sense of self-worth, isn't that a HUGE risk? What's
the stop-loss on THAT one? Risking 1/2% of my equity is one thing, but
putting my SELF on the line? How could anyone possibly play this game with
THAT kind of risk? Talk about "overtrading"!
(What occurs to me in thinking about that is this sense of "I have an
effective, proven trend-following methodology and the resources to trade it.
If I'm not making it work, then there is something wrong with me. And
therefore I can't win."
I
realize that I am the critical component in making the system work, which
elicits the concern that maybe there's something wrong with me that prevents
me from making it work. If the system is good but I'm not making it work
then there is something wrong
with me.)
The irony is that ultimately I have a lot of confidence in my self. I mean,
at the core of it. I'm persistent as hell and never quit at anything (except
temporarily) because in my heart I know that I can succeed if I just keep
working at it, if I stay alert and refine my approach, continue
correcting until I get the results I want. I believe there's always a way
and you just have to stick with it until you find it. (I'm not talking just
about trading, but about everything I take on.)
It's
funny because it's as though I really believe in my own ability to
succeed at anything, yet I still "need" some kind of external
validation to fully accept that! It's almost as though I believe that
anything is possible, but maybe, just maybe, it isn't possible for me. If
only I could get some external validation that would demonstrate that it IS
possible for me, then I could really believe in myself. (I can't even
begin to tell you how unpleasant it is for me, Mr. Self-Reliance, to
discover that about myself.)
And really, that's always been a concern in lots of things I do: "am I
cut out for this?" Is it meant for me? Am I on the right path? When
rationally I know that there isn't any path, that my life isn't
predetermined, that no one is pulling the strings. You make your choices and
you deal with them. But I need to know that I've made the right choice! It's
just like trying to predict the market! I need a "forecast" on my
future. I need to know in advance that I can pull this off, that this is
right for me. It's as though I need some kind of external validation for my
trading before I can fully commit to it.
In the meantime, I find myself going in and out of trading. I trade
for a while, then I stop. I wonder if there is something else I should be
doing. There isn't anything I'd rather do, but sometimes trading is just too
hard. Do I really want the stress? And yet, I'm well aware that my doubts
around it are fully rooted in wanting to avoid the discomfort of risk,
losses, etc. I never find myself thinking "I don't like trading, I'm
not interested in the markets, etc." I just find myself wanting to
avoid the markets when I'm not doing well, or when I'm getting "burned
out". Or when I just don't want to deal with the uncertainty of it
all. But I always come back to trading.
I find myself thinking "if I knew that I could succeed at trading at
the level at which I want to succeed, then I would be fully committed and
would never sway in my practice nor intentions. I'd just keep doing it until
I succeeded." (WHO WOULDN'T?!) As though it's even possible for me to
know that?! Who's going to "validate" me? Who's going to tap me on
the shoulder and say "You're it, you're the one, you're going to
succeed." Nobody! Rationally I realize that it's all up to me, that
whether or not I succeed is all a matter of commitment and am I willing to
do whatever it takes to succeed?
It's hard for me to write this to anyone, to admit this to anyone, because
I'm a very self-reliant person and pride myself on the way I think for
myself, and do what I want, without needing validation from anyone else. And
yet looking at what I've written here, it's very strange to realize that in
this area that is so important to me, I'm the exact opposite of all that I
stand for!
Bottom line: I have an effective system, I have the capital to trade it, I
have all the resources I need to succeed as a trader. But I'm having a
very hard time making that final leap of faith and confidence that would
have me fully committed. It's like I need to know first. There have been
things I've done in my life that I gave 110% too and they didn't work out.
So I hold back internally now. I don't want to give 100% unless I know I can
win. I don't want to give it my all only to be disappointed again. If
only I could get some validation, some evidence, some cue that I can win,
THEN I'd give it 100%. Rationally I know that's "messed up",
but it's what there for me, at the feeling level.
----- second send
---
Mr. Seykota:
Upon further reflection and re-reading of my previous comments to you (which
are pasted below as well), I realize that I didn't communicate my thoughts
accurately. Two points:
1) Re: "validation". Re-reading my comments, I think I give the
impression of someone who seeks validation before making any moves. Nothing
could be farther from the truth. For my entire adult life, I've always done
my own research and drawn my own conclusions. It's very rare that I solicit
opinions from others. Having stuttered severely since I was a child, I
learned pretty quick not to pay too much mind to what others think about me
or what I'm doing.
When I speak of "validation", it's not a "lifestyle".
It's more like, in this particular case, with trading, I think it would be
great if someone who knew what he was talking about told me I'm on the right
track. BUT, a) that's not a request nor the purpose of my email and b) I'm
perceptive enough to realize that no one can ever give me genuine
validation.
It's up to me, and
nobody else is qualified to figure out whether I can or can't do something.
Even if Market Wizard Ed Seykota said "listen man, you have it together
and you're gonna' be one of the greats", it wouldn't take more than
three days before I'd conclude that "Ed Seykota doesn't really know me
so he might be wrong." In short, I'd love some validation, but in
the end, I know it wouldn't matter because the issue is internal and no
amount of external feedback is going to resolve it.
2) I realized that much of my "approach - avoidance" of trading
has to do with the fear of losses. BUT NOT in the traditional sense that
traders often describe. I have NO problem with taking losses. Stops are not
an issue for me. So long as losses are taken within the parameters of my
system, under the rules I've set forth for myself, I don't care much
about losses. But where my issue with losses becomes a real
"issue" is that I think I fear insurmountable losses. Not a
"blow-out" trade, because I account for that and protect myself
with stops. And I trade too small, as a percentage of equity, for any trade
to do much damage. But I'm concerned about a string of losses, one of
those "against the odds" runs of losses that hurts me.
But it goes a bit deeper than that. This is what I meant when I talked
earlier about my results defining me. I realize that I have a pretty healthy
level of self-confidence. I don't think I could be where I am without it.
(I'm a confident person, but if I go too long without results, I can start
to question myself.) But I find myself worried that somehow I'll end up on
the wrong side of the odds and that any given string of losses can MEAN that
I'm destined for more and more losses. It's a bit like "if I start
trading again next week and take some losses, I'm afraid it'll just be the
beginning of the end for me."
TOTALLY irrational. I've worked out the numbers, risk of ruin, etc. For this
to happen it would require a) an exceptionally unlikely probability and b)
that I sit back and keep taking losses, doing nothing about it. Which is
absurd, because I can exercise a lot of control over how, when, how much I
trade. I have self discipline. I would never allow myself to get crushed.
Mind you, I've been trading and/or investing for about 18 years. A few
years on the floor, even. And I've NEVER taken a big loss. I've NEVER
been hurt bad. So it's not like I'm replaying some bad trade and shying away
from it. This is why I'm so puzzled about it. Because it's totally
irrational.
I have nothing
realistic to fear, I've proven to myself that I can handle losses, and yet I
find myself sometimes walking away from trading because of that fear.
What's at the heart of it, I think, is something like "Losses might
mean that I'm a loser, might be an indication that I'm destined to
fail." I'm not afraid of losses. I'm afraid of LOSING, as a
"lifestyle", if you will. Maybe there's even a little bit of
"I don't want to go for it committed because I don't want to discover
that I can't win."
There's a sense of
"I want to win, it's important to me to win, and if there's a chance of
losing, if I can't be certain that I'm going to win, I'm hesitant to
play." I gotta' know first that I can win, but in something like this,
that's not possible!
Any insights on how to get out of this mind trap?
Thanks ...
----- third send
-----
Mr. Seykota -
So sorry to bombard with you so many long emails about myself. I'm sure our
little dramas, while utterly fascinating to ourselves, are not nearly so
interesting to others! But I've literally been sitting here all day
writing and pondering these issues. And I think maybe I've hit on something.
First let me ask you, are the "aha" experience and the sensations
you describe "required" as part and parcel of an accurate insight?
I mean, I think I'm relatively self-aware and I'm not generally shocked or
surprised at what comes out of the depths of my mind.
I'm wondering if
only "aha" insights are valid or maybe some people get the
"aha" because their "stuff" lies deeper and it's a
bigger shock when it surfaces. Maybe for some of us, there's no
"aha" because it's not something actively avoided or suppressed,
but just something that we didn't give much thought to, even though we're
"aware" of it?
I ask because I've come up with some things that make a lot of sense to
me, but I'm not feeling any dramatic sensations nor a major AHA! It just
seems to fit and it makes a lot of sense to me.
I'll try to keep it brief:
In elementary school I was the "smartest" kid in the class. I KNEW
I was going to win the spelling bee and go on to the district finals. I
practiced the word list over and over and I did everything in my power to
assure that I'd win. I lost. Second place. Because I misheard the word! I
spelled the wrong word and lost on a word that I could easily have spelled.
As a kid I entered a contest to win a jacket. I wanted that jacket more than
anything. I prayed every night to win, made all kinds of promises to God. In
my mind I did everything I could to win that jacket. But I didn't.
I think somewhere in there I concluded "I can't win at what I really
want. If it's really important to me, I can do everything in my power, but I
won't get it." I know I concluded this somewhere because when I get
under stress, when something doesn't work out, that's where I go: "I
can't win! It doesn't matter how hard I try, life is rigged against
me."
As an adult, two things I really wanted: to "fix" my speech and
be a really good trader. I busted my butt at both. I did everything. I
never gave up, I just kept working and working and working, but without
getting the results I wanted. It made no sense to me that someone could
work so hard, persist for so long, and not get the results he wanted.
I've succeeded at lots of stuff. Lots of stuff comes easy to me. But that
stuff "doesn't count" because I don't do well at the things that
really matter to me. (In other words, I dismiss all evidence contrary to my
belief in order to maintain my belief!)
So I think I'm in this loop:
Belief says I can't have what I really want.
I really want to be a good trader. So I can't. Because I really want it. But
I don't give up, I have to try. I can't give up on what I want. I couldn't
live with myself if I didn't try. But all the trying in the world won't
matter because I can't win at what I really want.
So I end up in this approach avoidance thing, depending on which part of me
is dominant at the time: my persistence, or my belief that I can't win.
And THIS is why losses MEAN so much to me. Because every loss I take is
not just a loss, not just part of the system, not just an ordinary part of
trading, but it's EVIDENCE that I can't win. It's "proof" that my
belief will be realized, that I can't win at what's really important to me.
If this is indeed the issue, I can see my way out of it. But I'm left
wondering if it is indeed the issue, since I didn't have this
"aha" experience.
|
Congratulations
on confronting these issues, and sharing your item with FAQ, as many readers
can identify with you.
Your situation seems consistent with
some forms of early neglect.
See the Trading Tribe Process, at
Methods.
Toxic
Parents
sometimes
pass on a legacy of seeking invalidation. If this is true for you, you might
find yourself, and some of your lost feelings, in a book such as this.
Clip: www.amazon.com
|
|
Wed, 7 May 2003
The
Trading Tribe Process - Some Thoughts on the Theory
Hi Ed,
First, that it works is that it works. Given current level of neuroscience, a
theory of human cognition is more important as an account that can increase
its ability to work, than its neurological accuracy.
I feel drawn to point out similarities to other parallel work that
might elaborate the patterns you have put forth. In that spirit, I've
attached an article on the "reading faces" work of Paul Ekman. You
can also find this at
http://www.gladwell.com/2002/
2002_08_05_a_face.htm
.
I am also put in mind of the work of Dr. Dave Dobson. He thought the term
unconscious mind misleading. You may share this in common, like Fred.
Utilizing some of the early NLP awarenesses, he pointed out that the right
brain (hemisphere) typically processes experiences (pictures and feelings)
while the left brain processes words.
Cross hemispheric
activity creates functional action patterns and labels and dysfunctional
ones as well. In Dobson's way of thinking; modern, educated people are
typically trying to run their brains with the labels (what he termed the
Conscious mind) while they are being run by their experiences (which he
termed the Other-than-conscious mind).
He had an
attraction to the old Quaker adage: "You can't think your way into
better acting, but you can act your way into better thinking."
He described the
Conscious mind, very similar to Milton Erickson, as a "gift" of
the "Other than conscious mind."
Erickson
insisted that feelings came from the unconscious. This appears to parallel
your ideas about thoughts and feelings.
Dobson's model
encourages a left/right orientation instead of an up/down. Erickson also
talked about the front of the mind and the back of the mind. Each is
interestingly different.
In my experience, consciousness and other-than-consciousness have different
functional properties. In line with your description of Fred and Erickson's
description of the unconscious, other than consciousness runs the ongoing
show, while consciousness punctuates experience with evaluations.
Difficulties arise when this one attempts to use the system designed for
evaluations to run the ongoing show. A kind of right tool for the job
approach to mind. |
Milton
Erickson is famous for pacing and mirroring.

Milton
Erickson
Master
of bypassing the conscious mind
and
communicating directly with Fred
http://www.erickson-foundation.org/
|
|
Wed, 7 May 2003
Money Management and R-multiples
Dear Ed,
I just found out about The Trading Tribe yesterday. My deep compliments for
it. As a long time trader, I have to admit that your answers and the
accompanying pictures made me have some long laugher in a very respectful
way.
After trading for
more than 15 years I start to believe to know (of course I will never really
know) that I've met the biggest enemy toward trading and it is within
myself.
Repeating
behaviors in similar trading situations seems to fit each other like on a
play script for a actor. Therefore I strongly support the idea to put great
time to psychological ground works in a way like finding out about the good
intentions of bad feelings (while trading, i.e. fear, greed, guilt,
anxiousness etc.) This forum is a wonderful basis to do so.
Besides, gaming theories and money management theories helped me much to try
to understand the way, why 10 different traders trading the same market,
entering at the very same time, price and direction, will finally show 10
different results. In that respect I tend to believe that the only
rational in testing is to find a way to fit money and risk management into
one's personal beliefs. (Hopefully beliefs which will support my activity)
I've read all FAQ from this year and interestingly I've never found a
question regarding the money management sector, which separates core equity
money and markets money in a way, that different risk parameters may present
a way to enable people to find some algorithms which may better fit their
ability to accept the DD's.
Question 1: Do you put strong importance into balancing and rebalancing
core and markets money or do you totally ignore this factor?
Question 2: On several occasions you have stated that day trading has a big
disadvantage against position trading (in a trend following matter, of
course). While I fully agree and understand your arguments, it may be
forgotten that on the basis of a very small risk level (i.e. market move) a
trade may be established on a day trading basis just to move it over into a
position trade, letting the market create a big risk multiple of the
initial risk (1R). With the help of sound money management techniques (core
money and markets money, pyramiding etc.) someone totally against looking at
the markets on a intra day basis may be very well rewarded.
I found such
concepts to be especially promising trading the S&P. Interestingly such
trades occur maybe 10 - 20 times an year, and have a low success
probability. (Maybe that's why most traders I know dislike to trade that
way) but the overall mathematical expectancy per trade is/was very high.
What are your thoughts on concepts like this ?
Thank you and all the best |
Dynamic
rebalancing is no substitute for riding a wild bull market.
Trading long term trends with close
initial entry stops is different from day trading.

Riding
a Wild Bull
Not
exactly the right time to stop and balance your checkbook.
http://anuko.bei.t-online.de/
America/Texas-rodeo.html
|
|
Wed, 7 May 2003
Different Kind
of FAQ
see: Genie
I never said their association with great traders but with industry was the
one of the reason of success of those people. Being with those GREAT people
was one of the privilege of being with industry. A lot of different things a
learnt when you are in a particular environment. When one explains thing in
audience the effect is different as compared to when you are trying to learn
through cyberspace. I believe this thing is mentioned somewhere in Ed's FAQ.
Also calling Ed's FAQ's, FAQ, also intrigues me as usually most of the
questions are different!
FAQ are usually
posted against a particular product on a website and they usually stay the
same in number and content.
I hope the person who sent the question is not associated with the financial
industry!
|
FAQ
sites normally provide tips for operating technical products.
The
Trading Tribe FAQ follows the Socratic Method - the teachers (the traders
over there on the left) ask me questions to educate me.

Tech
Support FAQ
Q:
shaver doesn't go on
A:
plug it in
Q:
on now - still doesn't work
A:
stand closer
http://www.consumer.philips.com/global |
|
Wed, 7 May 2003
Melbourne Tribe
Hello Ed
I would like to form an Intentional Community in Australia.
|

Welcome
Melbourne
Australia!
You
are now on-line on the Tribe Directory Page.

Melbourne
Map: www.expedia.com
|
| Tue, 06 May 2003
Exploring Feelings
Dear Ed,
I thank you so much for all your help and for having this FAQ. I am starting
to realize that my inner feelings and my perception of myself are priorities
I need to address, rather than the nuances of my system.
You say many times to explore your feelings about a
particular topic in your responses. How does one explore and reconcile
(make peace ) with these feelings?
I feel like your reference to playing and replaying
dramas out in my trading is and in my life is my daily existence.
I need to settle this so that I can have a quality of life
at home and in my trading. What do you suggest as far as a simple way to get
started. Thank you again. |
In response to many
inquiries about the work of the Trading Tribe, I am posting The Trading
Tribe Process, to document some technology that seems to work. See the link
above.


Meet Fred |
|
Tue, 6 May 2003
Bursting O | |