|
September 21 - 30, 2007
<==
Previous
| Next ==>
|
Note: The intention of inclusion of charts in FAQ is
to illustrate trading principles - The appearance of a chart does not imply
any kind of indication or recommendation to buy, sell, hold or exit any
positions. |
|
Questions
(Quotes from Ed in Red)
|
Answers |
|
Sun, 30 Sep
2007
Helping
(fixing?) Other People
Ed says, "You might consider taking your feelings
about <who gets todetermine "the best" and "unhealthy"> to your Tribe.
Thanks Ed. I am considering.
I agree that in an ideal case, each person gets to determine his / her
own "best" interest and what's "good" for them.
I also want to be fully supportive of others, to be just the way they
are. For example, a tribe member who has been very supportive decides to
stop participating. I feel sadness and an emptiness in the heart. I take
the feelings to the hot seat. The member later wrote me many kinds words
and expressed gratitude, but just felt the need to stop. I notice that
this is his pattern and I just encourage him to stop. I feel good about
it.
I find it a lot difficult when the subject involved is a close family
member though. I also want to support them to be exactly the way they
are. Yet, just like you can't share feelings with someone who is drunk
or on a drug, I find it difficult to genuinely support others who is
clearly on a destructive pattern.
If say a person decides that the "best" way to deal with the trouble in
his life is to use alcohol to numb his feelings, do you just support him
to keep denying reality? He probably doesn't think it is "unhealthy" at
all despite it is clear that heavy drinking is harmful to his liver.
How can I provide support?
|
You might consider taking your
feelings of <wanting to provide support> to your Tribe. |
|
Sun, 30 Sep
2007
Health Care
and Fundamental Rights
Hi Ed,
Somehow I turn on TV and there's Oprah. It's one in which she istalking
about health care. She poses a question that keeps me pondering, "Do you
believe, that a poor kid has a fundamental rights to receive health
care, as a rich kid?"
Sir, can you please share your answer to the question? Also, is your
answer the same if we replace "health care" with "education"?
Many thanks. |
A right is an entitlement or claim
on assets.
In a private property system there
are no "fundamental rights." There are only rights that one entity
voluntarily awards another entity.
As government grows, it uses the
"fundamental rights" and "fairness" arguments to manufacture rights for
itself and to take rights from the citizens.
Government sometimes awards
services, such as health care, as a way to justify taking rights.
Government rarely awards rights,
such as the right to take the salary or the power of any of the
government employees.
Health care tends to increase in
quality and availability in a free-enterprise system and to decrease in
a socialist system.

The Bill of Rights
December 15, 1791
This set of ten amendments
to the US Constitution
limits the power of government.
Clip:
http://imagecache2.allposters.com/
images/pic/OWP/2331B~Bill-of-Rights-Posters.jpg |
|
Date: Sun, 30
Sep 2007
Wants a
Baby - Doesn't Trust Men
Dear Ed,
now I know where the bear is hanging. (see
below) Again tremendously practical advice on this page (I don't
read many others).
Ed says: You might consider getting into your
empty feeling.
I am not sure whether I do it or not. The next morning I have a very
vivid and lasting dream about me breastfeeding a baby.
My fears about
risking my health by having one are gone. I note that the day before I
looked at FAQ of Mon 25 Jun, 2007 where you can see two lovely mothers
breastfeeding their babies. Nevertheless this is exceptional, because I
don't dream very much and if so, the dreams leave no lasting impression.
This one does for a day or so leaving me in a great mood.
I also do note that my snapshot about partnership looks more like
"Parasites and lazybones, beware of the dog. The dog is going to bite
your head off".
I recognize
that I have a collection of those around me when I go out for lunch and
stop going there for awhile. I piss-off a guy at the phone and
personally and have to realize that this is my story. The guy is just
laughing. Now I am at the point where I was when I read your book.
I do
realize that I just don't trust the guys (great place to put it in
here). It then happens in real time. I call one up for going to cinema
and he says: Guess what? I am not [home], I am in [another city],
visiting my girl-friend. Wow, the same guy wanted to talk me into going
with him after we meet ... Sunday. I just don't feel really good right
now. I know ...
Strangely enough at the same time the mental block to remove the jungle
in my flat vanishes. Something like: if you can piss the guys off
verbally, you don't need to have a jungle in your flat so that none of
them can visit you. Instead the un-feeling is back. Time for a Monday
and some nice work, I suppose.
I read the TTP alternative about treating a daughter with great
interest. (see below) I hope you point
out more of these TTP alternatives in your new book.
The TTP
alternative concerning relationships your current book impressed me very
much and clearly showed me my k-nots about relationships as described
above.
All the best ... |
Thank you for sharing your process.
You might consider taking your
feelings about <having a baby> and <trusting men> to your Tribe.

Family
The Essential Tribe
Clip:
http://www.stevensaquatics.com/
FamilyKidsRecreationalSwimming.asp |
|
Sun, 30 Sep
2007
Snapshots
and TTP
Dear Ed,
you mentioned a Milton Erickson on your page and I read a book about
him: Milton H. Erickson, M.D.: An American Healer.
I note: Wow, it is happening ... without Milton. My friend is sitting
here with glassy eyes, describes his snapshots and then he starts
solving his problems on the spot.
He really
likes Snapshots. And I am a little bit envious because I am not
progressing as fast as he is. He doesn't even read your material, I
suspect.
In TTP, on the other hand, he was actually going for me and I was hit. I
can bring him back on track but don't know how to deal with the fact
that I get his anger right in my face (criticism, complaints, power
struggle).
I get
angry, too, and cannot deal with it really. I suppose we have to
talk about it or are there certain rules you propose for group
situations like that? (We just had four TTP processes up to now and just
one is finished). |
Thank you for sharing your process.
You might consider taking your
feelings about <dealing with anger> to your Tribe.

Anger
One positive intention
is boundary management.
Clip:
http://www.straightblastgym.com/blog/
uploaded_images/anger2-747499.jpg |
|
Sun, 30 Sep
2007
Out-of-Limits Pain
Ed,
Ed says, "Pain is any feeling you are unwilling to
experience." (FAQ, 12/24/06)
Hi Ed, this sounds very different from the everyday usage of pain that
we are familiar with. Can you please elaborate what you mean by pain as
ANY FEELING we are unwilling to experience?
I go through a lot of feelings I am initially unwilling to experience
during my various hot seat sessions: frustration, annoyance, lethargy,
grouchy, sadness ... all of which I don't quite willing to experience
but none of which I'd classify as pain (as in physical suffering or
distress, mental or emotional suffering or torment, according to the
dictionary definition.)
In fact, I notice in a way, as long as the pain is within limits,
sometimes I am quite willing to experience (e.g. the pain associated
with working out really hard).
Thanks.
-----
P.S.
As I'm writing, I recall the pain I had during my last Breathwork
session at your place with an excruciating painful leg cramp. It brings
back good memories. |
When you experience your
out-of-limits pain, you convert it from an adversary to an ally on your
emotional instrument panel.
A supportive container, such as the
TTP healing field of acknowledgment is essential to encourage you
through this process.

Some People Try to Avoid Pain
others line up for it,
and some go to Tribe,
to work through it,
and move on.
When you become willing
to experience
what you think is painful,
it ceases running your life.
Clip:
http://www.spankinggate.com/spanking.jpg |
|
Sun, 30 Sep
2007
Associates Program:
Different Simulation Results
for NYSE, AMEX and NASDAQ
Hey Ed,
About 2 weeks ago I setup a database of equities from CSI that includes
all listed and delisted stocks from the NYSE, NASDAQ, AMEX since 1982
and I up my computer's memory capacity to 8 gigs to handle the 28,000 +
symbols.
After running numerous back-tests on different subsets of
the database, I realize that the parameter settings that work well on
NYSE stocks don't work as well with NASDAQ stocks, have you seen this
phenomenon in your testing as well? |
Widely different results on
different portfolios may indicate instrument-specific optimizations and
/ or other curve-fitting complications.
Robust stock-trading systems tend to
generate similar results for random selections of 50-100 stocks.
If you come up with a simple system
that shows substantially different results for 100 random-selection
stocks from NASDAQ and NYSE, let me know.
Note: Some data bases stop
publishing a stock price series when the company fails and / or the
stock goes off the board - so you may also have some "survivorship bias"
in your data. This effect may be stronger for new high-tech
companies than for the old blue chips. |
|
Sat, 29 Sep
2007
TV as a
Market Indicator
Hedge Funds in Hollywood
TV and movies have rediscovered Wall Street.
Time to sell!
By Daniel Gross
Posted Wednesday, Sept. 26, 2007, at 4:37 PM ET
http://www.slate.com/id/2174790/fr/flyout
Popular culture, which is created by some of the least business-savvy
people on the planet, has always been slow to latch onto business and
economic trends. The covers of large-circulation magazines are a good
contrary indicator. And TV, movies, and books are even worse. Twelve to
15 months can elapse between the first formal pitch of a new sitcom and
the debut of the pilot. With movies and books, the lead times are even
longer. By the time the film hits the multiplex or the book shows up on
Amazon, the business phenomenon it describes has frequently gone
bust-which is why hedge-fund managers and their investment-banking
cousins should be very worried about the onslaught of Wall Street-themed
pop culture.
We've seen this before. Tom Wolfe's Bonfire of the Vanities timed the
zeitgeist-and the market-perfectly, debuting in October 1987, the month
the 1980s bull market came to a crashing end. But Oliver Stone's Wall
Street didn't hit the theaters until December 1987 and tanked at the box
office as a result. After a few punk years, Wall Street caught fire
again in the mid-1990s. But programming executives didn't catch on to
the new wave until much later.
Darren Star,
who had neatly captured a cultural moment with HBO's Sex and the City,
rolled out The $treet on Fox in the fall of 2000. This show about the
professional and personal lives of attractive employees at a New York
brokerage firm arrived at a time when Wall Street was falling out of
favor, and lasted just 12 episodes, one more than Bull, which was also
about the professional and personal lives of attractive employees at a
New York brokerage. The real-estate bubble produced the ABC sitcom Hot
Properties, a bawdy send-up of the lives of four attractive real-estate
brokers. It debuted in the fall of 2005, just as housing prices were
about to peak, and went into foreclosure after 13 unfunny episodes.
Real estate has been replaced in the public's imagination by hedge
funds, private-equity firms, and really rich people-who are enjoying
record bonuses, a degree of income inequality not seen since the Gilded
Age, and a popular-culture renaissance.
For the last
several months, analysts (and envious journalists) have been eager to
call a top in the phenomenon of extreme wealth creation, pointing to
phenomena like the explosion of hedge funds, or Blackstone founder Steve
Schwarzman's over-the-top birthday party, or this summer's credit
crunch. But the best signals of the impending fall of the ultra-rich can
be found in TV Guide.
The fall slate includes Dirty Sexy Money, an ABC drama about an
insanely rich and charmingly dysfunctional American family based in New
York ("they put the upper in Upper East Side"). And Big Shots, an
ABC drama about four insanely rich and charmingly dysfunctional
corporate hot shots based in New York. And Cashmere Mafia, an ABC
drama about four insanely rich and charmingly dysfunctional female
corporate hot shots based in New York. (Frances O'Connor plays Zoe, a
"top investment banker.") The sidekick on CBS's new vampire show,
Moonlight, is "eternally young, wealthy and mischievous Josef,
a hedge
fund trader who relishes his uniqueness."
And there's more to come. Doug Ellin, who developed Entourage for
HBO, is making an HBO series based on a hedge fund. He hired writers
this summer and hopes to launch the series next summer alongside Season
5 of Entourage. Ellin and his crew better hurry, though. If this fall's
TV slate isn't enough to make you think big, New York-based money is
overplayed, other news coming out of Hollywood should.
Fortune
reports that Michael Douglas has committed to reprise his role of Gordon Gekko in a sequel to Wall Street. By rights, the new Gekko should have
evolved from a corporate raider into a hedge-fund manager or a
private-equity honcho. But at least one Hollywood-type has learned from
history. Cognizant of the fact that movies can be extremely poor market
timers, screenwriter Stephen Schiff is hedging his bets. "I don't want
to date the film," Schiff told Fortune when asked about Gekko's
professional life. "With what's going on right now, the question is:
Where will the unassailable money end up? It might not be hedge funds." |
Thank you for the link.
Here are some other shows you might
see:
How about a sitcom with a balloon
vendor who leaves home at an early age to eventually become Chairman of
the Fed: The Runaway Inflator
Or a show about a carpenter who
remodels old homes and finds the costs of upgrading the garage exceeds
the original purchase price of the house: This Old House Goes Through
the Roof
Or one about a mortgage
broker who wears a mask and carries a pistol with silver bullets: The
Loan Arranger

The Loan Arranger and Don't-Owe
tail some Florida condo speculators
who fall behind
on their variable-rate mortgages.
Clip:
http://www.lsjunction.com/facts/fiction.htm |
|
Sat, 29 Sep
2007
Getting to Bliss
Hi Ed,
I feel like sending a note. I am reading the FAQ more and more and feel
it benefits me, in that I know I need to dive in deeper.
I trade (live life also) and notice all sorts of feelings
that arise. I follow the system I get feelings; I break rules I get
feelings, I go thru the day I get feelings. I try to feel them, but only
a bit. It is different; I am more willing and aware of them.
I become aware or sense there is a lake or pool of feelings in me that I
judge as “bad” and thus feeling them is uncomfortable. I do feel them
but my sense is I need to be willing to swim in the lake, even drown in
it if that is what is called for. I feel a resistance to do this, like
“if I am sad all day or week what would that be like?” I judge it as
“knot” good.
So I take a breath I feel and feel, I sit in front of the PC and just
feel. I remember [Name] talking about people who just sat and looked at
their mind till they got to the bottom and went thru all sorts of
incredibly powerful emotions and at the bottom was “Nothing”; then I
think about feelings as helpful, useful and much needed. I think
“Judging, good and bad who gave me those ideas anyway?”
I am typing again and feel willing to feel more. I send you an order for
the TT book and send an email to the closest tribe asking to visit. I
feel peaceful, calm and alive! I listen to an artist who as you put it
“they don't have the talent-the talent has them”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ayc7oBR1ZGA&mode=related&search=
One just is not enough:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTsHn9a9u1c
Wow, to trend the way Phil Keaggy is the guitar, that is bliss function,
would you agree?
Continued and growing thanks to you and the Tribes for all the help! |
Thank you for sharing your process.
People who just sit and look at
their mind rarely get to the bottom of anything.
People who sit with others - and
encourage each other to stay with their feelings typically get there.
People who sit and play like Keaggy
(and, of course, Fleck) are likely already there.

Meditation
can be a form of
medication.
Clip:
http://universalblogger.files.
wordpress.com/2007/05/meditation.jpg |
|
Sat, 29 Sep
2007
Ice Cream or Candy
Hi Ed,
Here's an encounter between my brother-in-law and his 2-year-old
daughter:
Daughter takes candy and ice-cream.
Father: Remember what the doctor says about your health? He says you
need to cut down your sugar. So how about this, you can have only candy
or ice-cream, but not both.
Daughter picks candy.
Father says, "So if you pick candy, you cannot have ice-cream, OK?"
Daughter pauses for a moment, then picks ice-cream.
Father says, "So if you pick ice-cream, you cannot have candy, OK?"
Daughter picks ice cream and starts eating.
After finishing the ice cream, the father later catches his daughter
ignores the agreement and starts having candies too.
At this point, the father has a mixture of feelings: feels a little
funny about the his daughter's behavior, a little disappointment to her
daughter's failure to honor her words, a little angry about the
violation of a contract, and a little worried about her health as the
doctor's words ring in his head.
So how would you feel if your little kid violates an agreement with you?
What would you say to the kid?
|
Here's a TTP alternative:
Doctor:
Your daughter needs to cut down on sugar.
Father: What does that mean?
Doctor: Sometimes it's OK to eat sugar. Just
try to cut down in general.
-----
Father: The doctor says he wants you to cut down on
sugar - that too much sugar can harm you. I wonder how you
feel about that.
Daughter: I like sugar. How do you feel about
it?
Father: I like sugar too and I love you. I also
want to support you in making your own decisions and in running your
own life. I feel that sugar makes me kind of buzzy, and then sad
later, and that if I do not exercise properly, it can make me fat.
Daughter: I love you too, daddy. Thank
you for telling me about sugar. I like the sugar buzz and I like to
exercise and I think I can cut down on sugar sometimes. All
this talk about sugar is giving me a sweet tooth right now! Do
we have any candy or ice cream around.
Father: We have both.
Daughter: I'd like a small portion of both.
Father: OK. I think I'll join you in that.
-----
In the scenario you present, the
Father does not share his feelings. He invokes higher authority to set a
rule. He then invents a rule for his daughter without discussion.
He then teases her by showing both and telling her she must deny herself
one of them.
The father appears to medicate his
fear of intimacy by being domineering and making others squirm.
He is teaching his daughter that her
feelings don't count, that men don't share feelings and that they are
mean and capricious.
Daughter is likely to grow up to
select boy friends, bosses and a husband with characteristics similar to
her father's.
This pattern is quite common.
Since neither the father or daughter
is writing me about this or complaining to me, I do not see either one
feels they have a problem with the way their Rocks co-operate.
The father and daughter are likely
not asking you for help, either. Nevertheless, you appear to feel
some need to intervene.
You are the one writing me about
this so you evidently have some feelings about it that you are not
sharing. In this way, you resemble the father. If you wish to
continue this thread, please present your feelings about this situation.

Fathers and Daughters
can relate in many ways.
-----
People who medicate their own feelings
about the behavior of others
by intervening in others' affairs
without invitation
typically intensify conflict
in families
and in countries.
Clip:
http://www.termlifeoptions.com/ |
|
Fri, 28 Sep
2007
Bear Hangs
On
Ed,
http://www.tahoedailytribune.com/
article/20070918/Region/109180037 |
Thank you for
the link.

Metaphor
Clip:
http://www.tahoedailytribune.com/
article/20070918/Region/109180037 |
|
Thu, 27 Sep
2007
Addiction
to Feeling Successful #4
see previous
Ed,
At this point I don't have much to write to FAQ as the
"form" or whatever you like to name has gone down into the guts in the
form of a slight inner pressure or tension. At this point I am alone I
think, and there is nothing you can do. I don't have a Tribe either.
Your insistence to tell me that I might take this or that feeling to my
tribe (that I don't have) doesn't seem to help either.
It doesn't feel "receptive". I think the "alternative
approach" works better, even though it feels like so distant, impersonal
and thoroughly systematic that I wonder if I am communicating with a
machine. |
Thank you for sharing your feelings.
To continue along these lines, you can form a Tribe and start
practicing TTP, per the examples on this site, the instructions in the
Trading Tribe book and/or the training at the Workshop.
You can then report your experience
of sharing your feelings to
this column to clarify your process and to inspire others. |
|
Thu, 27 Sep
2007
Drama-Less
Ed,
The drama is gone.
And there
is this remarkable lack of pain in my chest.
Whatever
should I do ???
|
You might write something up for
FAQ.
 |
|
Thu, 27 Sep
2007
Addiction
to Feeling Successful #3
see
previous
Ed,
Two Posts of "Addiction to Feeling Successful" are very interesting.
Some feelings come up when I read through them. I don't know how to
write these feelings out, but I enjoy experiencing them. I also enjoy
the feelings of medicating myself by writing to FAQ now.
Experiencing the feelings of "Trend following is hard" might benefit to
people who embrace trends.
|
Thank you for sharing your AHA. |
|
Thu, 27 Sep
2007
Helping (fixing?) Other People
Dear Ed,
My understanding of TTP is that we do not try to fix other people but
just celebrate and support the way they are. We work on fixing ourselves
instead, for it is an inter-connected/systemic universe. When we fix
ourselves, in a magical way it affects others in the process.
Two questions come to mind:
1) How far would you go in "supporting others to be just the way they
are"? Fully, unreservedly, without question, no matter what?
If you see something that feels clearly "wrong" (e.g. being
irresponsible), can you genuinely encourage the person to be "as
irresponsible as possible", just the way he is? I find it difficult,
especially if that person is a closed one. I feel that my desire to
"wish them the 'best'" interferes with my desire to "support them
to be exactly the way they are."
When I see how their habitual behavior likely would result in a
destructive, unhelpful and unhealthy consequence to them, it is
difficult for me not to "do something to help them."
2) I know, I know. The way to "help them" is to work on myself. But how
is it a more effective way to, instead of working directly with the
subject, work indirectly and rely on the inter-connectedness of a system
to deliver the change?
Many thanks! |
You might consider taking your
feelings about <who gets to determine "the best" and "unhealthy"> to
your Tribe.

Picking the Best Spice Girl
requires
a picker.
Clip:
http://evilbeetgossip.film.com/wp-content/
uploads/2007/06/spice_girls.jpg |
|
Thu, 27 Sep
2007
Population, Income and Longevity
Ed,
You might like to check out drop down menu in top right of screen to
change chart data
Link:
http://tools.google.com/gapminder |
OK. |
|
Wed, 26 Sep
2007
Associate
Program - Progress Report
Hi Ed,
I complete a new version of the TSP EA that allows me to backtest
multiple markets. I backtest my equity strategy to see how the results
look.
The strategy
trades the 9 SPDR ETFs that make up the S&P500. The growth rate (icagr)
increases with heat and the MAR is higher than trading the S&P500 alone.
It seems that
diversifying even within a broad index can improve risk / reward. These
ETFs only go back to the end of 1998, so I cannot see how the system
fairs on Black Monday in 1987. I am working on further refining the
results of my strategy.
I am next focusing on optimizing my system parameters.
My experiment with my first trend trade continues. I am still long GLD
as my stop is not hit. I feel more calm about my position. I try to let
the system do its thing instead of worrying about what is going to
happen. I tend to check the market less throughout the day.
When I feel
anxious, I take a break from my work and do some deep-breathing. It
tends to alleviate the tightness in my chest.
Tomorrow morning, I intend to move up my stop and increase my position
to maintain a 1% risk on the trade. |
Thank you for sharing your process.
You might consider continuing to
increase your simulation study heat until your MAR peaks and then falls.
In this way, you can determine your optimal heat.
Your substitution of deep breathing
for fussing with your market position is an excellent example of
replacing medicinal behavior with pro-active behavior.
If you are fixing to add-on to a
long-term position (the mor[e]on rule) you might like to consider
back-testing your method for doing so.

To Find The Optimal Point
you try a wide range of values of k.

Functions Show Optimal Values
where the trade-offs balance.
Clips:
http://www.math.uah.edu/stat/urn/Strategyk.png
http://telstar.ote.cmu.edu/environ/
m3/s6/09management.shtml |
|
Wed, 26 Sep
2007
Learning to
Trade - On the Road
see
Fussing with Crude
Ed,
On Wednesday, I am down over a little over $350 on the Dow Jones trade.
I am also in the process of writing up all of the information and
feelings relating to the Crude Oil trade I got out of and then back into
and am now out of again. I spend the day today traveling and should have
more access to markets tomorrow.
|
OK.

Being in an Airplane
(and not having access to the markets)
provides a dandy
place for (or)
excuse for not
dealing with feelings.
Clip:
http://www.math.uah.edu/stat/urn/
Strategyk.png
|
|
Wed, 26 Sep
2007
Addiction to Feeling Successful #2
see previous
Ed,
Ed Says: You might consider taking
the feeling of <success = being willing to follow a system regardless of
the short-term performance> to your Tribe.
I wonder what other forms of medication you and the author of the
article use to maintain the "perpetual high" you both seem to need in
order to function.
I don't know much about the author. I read though that he feels a kind
of compulsion to put on paper whatever he is thinking about, so he likes
writing articles and books.
About myself, I think have a myriad of minor medications that make up my
existential medication. Trading discretionarily used to be one. Browsing
the Internet, embracing new challenges, looking for knowledge, exploring
my mind, feelings and inner potential or limits among others might also
be some forms of medication. Incidentally, over the past few years, I
derived the most satisfaction from an intimate friendship with a great
female friend of mine, from increased spirituality and from
participating in a folk dance group since last November. Now I
contemplate the possibility of moving back to my hometown, owing to
professional reasons, and so having to leave the group and my friends.
That breaks my heart.
Now I am also thinking: if writing to FAQ might also be a medication
form to me, how do our rocks fit ? |
Thank you for sharing your process.
Nice insight about your using FAQ as
a form of medication. This opens an opportunity for me to consider
my own role in the drama.
To the extent that you keep writing
and do not (1) join a Tribe or (2) get into your feelings, one of your
medicinal rocks may be <ready, aim, analyze, analyze, analyze ... >.
To the extent that I am willing to
indulge you, and gently suggest you to join a tribe and get into your
feelings, one of my medicinal rocks may be <be patient, gentle and
pontificate>.
I wonder if you might be willing to
join a Tribe and get into your feelings so I can stop pontificating.
The alternative approach is for me
to stop responding to the analytical part of your emails.

When You Identify Your Pattern
you help me
identify mine.
Clip:
http://www.masternewmedia.org/news/
2006/08/09/opensource_networked_
journalism_meets_smartmobs.htm
|
|
Wed, 26 Sep
2007
Back-Tests
Ed,
Ed Says: You might consider taking your feelings
about <clueless> to your Tribe.
I have made some additional back-tests and I have found that my (inner)
refusal to work with in-sample/out-of-sample data might just have been
one of my biggest mistaken assumptions with regard to back-tests. Very
interesting how this TTP thing works. AHA. |
OK. |
|
Wed, 26 Sep
2007
Gold Standard
Ed says: Deflation increases the value of money
and helps raise the standard of living for people who save; it penalizes
those who borrow; it entrains low (even negative) interest rates.
I wonder if the Japanese feel this way.
Based on your words, one might think you're an athletic supporter of
deflation.
Here's what Milty says:
The Fed permitting the U.S. money supply to shrink by one-third brought
on the Great Depression. With one-third less money available to bid for
goods and services, prices had to fall. With the falling prices,
borrowers were unable to repay loans and depositors withdrew their
money, thus, the money supply shrank further as banks collapsed. |
You might consider going directly to
the source and asking "the Japanese" how they feel.
Business cycles, like the cycles in
your own body, have a positive intention. Your breathing system, blood
delivery system, eating system and elimination system are all
essentially cyclical. If you attempt to "overcome" or "stabilize"
these cycles you become ill.
Business cycles help to transfer
resources and manpower from inefficient firms to efficient ones and from
old technology to new technology. The supply of money and the rate of
interest vary to support the process as the cycle proceeds.
In a free economy, banks receive
deposits and make loans; you might choose to accept the "paper" of some
of the most stable banks as currency. Thus you automatically apply local
market incentives to motivate sound loan policies.
In the Fed system, you have no
choice about accepting the paper or not, since all system bank loans
atomically become "legal tender." Thus bank loan policies are relatively
free from market forces.
Absent the periodic cleansing effect
of free market business cycles, the economy tends to head toward debt
addiction and may wind up balancing precariously between credit collapse
and run-away inflation.

The Fed Bankers Meet Periodically
to medicate their feelings
about credit collapse.
They typically decide
that the best fix
is more credit.
Clips:
http://www.williampark.net/addictionL.jpg
http://www.scenta.co.uk/_db/_images/addiction.jpg |
|
Wed, 26 Sep
2007
Parallel Universes
Ed,
I thought you might like this. I wonder if our intention determines
which reality we play out individually.
Source:
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=
paUniverse_sun14_parallel_universes&
show_article=1&cat=0
Seems pretty far out there. |
Parallel universes may very well
exist - in some parallel universe.

Parallel Objects
do not intersect

The Parallel Universe Theory
includes branching
that is essentially non-parallel
Clip:
http://fizyka.phys.put.poznan.pl/~pieransk/
Physics%20Around%20Us/Parallel%20groves.jpg
|
|
Wed, 26 Sep
2007
Coming to Trend Following
Dear Ed,
i have only been involved with trading for a year ... i have no problem
admitting to being a cub in this field. over this short period of time,
i've studied both systems and descretionary type trading and found that
the latter does not and ultimately can not make sense in the real world.
the first few months i participated in the trading arena, i was beaten
up psyhcologically....my account was suffering too. i then stopped
trading and took the time to educate myself further. to make a long
story short, i was privileged to experience a huge AHA! moment when i
discovered something that was staring me straight in the face the whole
time; that markets trend regardless of (insert reason). i still cannot
understand why people (myself included) make things more complicated
than they really are. anyways, i just wanted to say thanyou for your
support and helping me come to "know thyself" better.
p.s. this post script is a bit selfish in nature as i was hoping you
could critique my trading philosophy (see below). obviously i am not
reinventing the wheel; in fact, i may be guilty of some plagiarism. you
know what they say, "if it ain't broke ..."
Trading Psychology
1. Cut losses
2. Ride winners
3. Trade with the trend
4. Keep your bets small
5. Follow your method and your rules, no exceptions
Always keep in mind the following
a. Emotion is the enemy of trading
b. You can’t control the market.
c. The market doesn’t care about you.
d. Draw downs are the cost of doing business.
e. You can be right less than half the time and still make a fortune.
f. Losers average losers.
"Remember that markets don't exist to make investors rich (although we
all hope they do!), they exist to provide liquidity; the ability to buy
or sell a stock, bond, or other asset quickly and easily at a current
consensus price of what that asset is worth." - Christopher Smythe -
Trading only tolerates people led by objective reasoning (see below).
1. In trading, reality exists as an objective absolute—facts are facts,
independent of one's feelings, wishes, hopes or fears.
2. Reason (the faculty which identifies and integrates the material
provided by man’s senses) is man's only means of perceiving reality,
man’s only source of knowledge, man’s only guide to action, and man’s
basic means of survival.
3. Man—every man—is an end in himself, not the means to the ends of
others. He must exist for his own sake, neither sacrificing himself to
others nor sacrificing others to himself. The pursuit of his own
rational self-interest and of his own happiness in trading is the
highest purpose of his career.
4. The ideal political-economic system is capitalism. It is a system
where men deal with one another, not as victims and executioners, nor as
masters and slaves, but as traders, by free, voluntary exchange to
mutual benefit.
|
Thank you for sharing your process.
You might consider at your "keep in
mind" points: create alliance relationship with your
emotions rather than an adversarial one.
You might consider, at your
objectivist points: identify the logical, objective reason that people
have feelings.

Movie Robots are More Effective
when they display emotion.
Clip:
http://www.persianstudents.org/
archives/robots.jpg |
|
Tue, 25 Sep
2007
Learning to
Trade - Fussing with Crude Oil
Ed,
On Tuesday, I am down over $1900. Most of this is attributable to the
Crude Oil trade I re-opened yesterday. I reopen this position not
because of the charts or because I had a plan, but because I
misunderstood something you say. Not a very sound rationale for making a
trade.
A good bit of
learning there for me to trust my own thoughts and feelings though.
Also, soybean oil hits its stop, as does Canadian dollar. So, I am now
out of everything except for my short Dow Jones position. I feel a
little anxious not being in more positions and wanting to make back what
I have lost from this Crude Oil trade.
This is
similar to the feeling I had when I missed out on the wheat trade and
tried doubling up on the Dow Jones only to see it take me out with a
double loss.
The situations
are different, but the feelings are very close to same feelings. So,
this time rather than jumping back in and trying to make it right back,
I am going to sit with this feeling, watch the markets and wait until I
see a situation that meets my criteria of an entry with a potential exit
to deliver 5-10x. |
You might consider taking
your feelings of <wanting to make it back> to your Tribe.
You might also consider
enumerating all the factors that you recall motivating the exact timing
of all the entries and exits of your Crude Oil short-term trading.
You might start by printing out an intra-day chart and marking your
executions on the chart.
If you do this carefully, and
discover your real trading system, you can then give someone else the raw
data and observe them coming up with the same trades.

October 2007 Crude Oil
Day-trading volatile markets
provides many opportunities
for drama. |
|
Tue, 25 Sep
2007
Addiction
to Feeling Successful
Ed,
I found this
interesting quotation from Thomas Stridsman:
"A good system
should have a maximum flat time of no longer than 18 months. In this
case, with a flat time of little more than 400 days, we come pretty
close to what is tolerable. If you started to trade this system just
prior to this drawdown, you would have started out losing, stuck it out
for approximately 1.5 years just to get your money back, and eventually
broke even. But don't despair; drawdowns are simply something you have
to learn to live with and the truth of the matter is that even the most
robust and profitable trading strategies will keep you feeling on your
way down more often than on your way up... The average time for this
system spent in a flat is 86 bars, and the average time between equity
lows is 66 bars.
In
"psychological terms" this means that only about four times per year, on
average, will you be allowed to feel like a really successful trader,
setting a new equity high; you will spend five times every year feeling
really rotten, setting a new equity low before the markets finally start
to move your way again. Most institutional investors will not tolerate a
drawdown over 30 to 35% of total equity, or a maximum flat time of more
than 18 months."
A very interesting point and funny "read" (rather than the experience)
of the Uncle Point, and why trend following can be so hard. |
You might consider taking the
feeling of <success = being willing to
follow a system regardless of the short-term performance> to your
Tribe.
I wonder what other forms of
medication you and the author of the article use to maintain the "perpetual high"
you both seem to
need in order to function.

Feel-Good Drugs
and medicinal trading behavior
can have side effects.
Clip:
http://kyletabor.tripod.com/Art/
Kyle_-_Branching_Out.gif |
|
Tue, 25 Sep
2007
Ahmadinejad's speech at Columbia
"They
(implying the US government), in fact, wish to justify their own
wrongdoings, though. By creating nonexistent enemies, for example,
and an insecure atmosphere, they try to control all in the name of
combating insecurity and terrorism ...They create an insecure
psychological atmosphere in order to justify their warmongering acts
in different parts of the world."
Somehow the part on "creating nonexistent enemies" and "insecure
psychological atmosphere" remind me of some of your responses on the FAQ
regarding the War on "Terror" (a feeling). Surprisingly it comes from
Ahmadinejad also.
|
This kind of rhetoric is
characteristic of people, groups or nations that are contemplating war. |
|
Tue, 25 Sep
2007
Amuse Our
Mind or Enjoy the moment of NOW
Ed,
I feel that our mind likes to be busy all the time. It seems that our
mind also has the tendency to find reasons for "whys".
More
interestingly, our mind searches the reasons that it wants, and filters
out the reasons that it doesn't want. So most of time we might just fool
ourselves and live in fantasy. The main "benefit" of this might be that
we don't have to feel all sorts of feelings that come out in real life
every day.
Models of TTP promote living in now. We follow what is happening and
taste all flavors of it. More I practice TTP, less I desire to figure
things out. I just follow the flow. It tastes good.
Thank you Ed for all your work and support. |
Thank you for sharing your
process. |
|
Mon, 24 Sep
2007
Learning To
Trade
Ed,
On Monday, I lose a little over $500. I re-open out my position on Crude
Oil and then watch it go down by almost a $1000 almost immediately. I
have not hit my stop so I am standing still on this.
This evening
after looking at the Canadian chart, I tighten my stop. I feel a
little bad because I did not follow my plan on the Crude (I intended to
wait until tomorrow to decide whether to get in again or not).
I do not mind
so much taking losses as I do in not following my plan.
I am looking for setups that give me a potential 5x or 10x return. Right
now, the short Dow Jones looks to have potential to deliver 5-10x return
in exchange for risk of one unit.
|
You might consider going back
over the Crude Oil trade to identify all the feelings that surround your
decision to get out, to get back in and to get out again.
The systems on the TSP page
do not day-trade. Indeed, they rarely trade at all. |
|
Mon, 24 Sep
2007
Joke
When the new patient was settled comfortably on the couch, the
psychiatrist began his therapy session.
"I'm not aware of your problem," the doctor said. "So perhaps, you
should start at the beginning."
"Of course, of course," replied the patient.
"In the beginning I created the heavens and the earth .... " |
In TTP we come to the point
of view that each of us creates our own reality - and the opportunity to
experience it. |
|
Date: Mon, 24
Sep
Testing
Ed Says: Yes. If you have questions about back
tests, you can find out answers by running your own back tests.
OK. I am trying to figure out ways to answer these questions about
curve-fitting through back-testing. I have always thought that (as there
is no way to "forward-test") such work requires practical knowledge and
involves discretion to the most part.
I have a new
program to run the tests. So I feel like studying the programming
language and also doing some research on books that deal with the
subject of building systems.
I feel rather
"clueless" about it. For instance, I find the reasoning of using
in-sample and out-of-sample price history a bit strange and illogical:
if I keep on searching for optimal results in the in-sample history and
"confirming" whether it's "truly optimal" in the out-of-sample history,
I might end up with the same parameters as if I did the optimization
process on the full price history, which seems more logical. Whatever. |
You might consider taking
your feelings about <clueless> to your Tribe. |
|
Mon, 24 Sep
2007
Maybe Baby
Hi All,
I'm struggling
to be in the Now. Ed, Any chance you can let me know of next
workshop in 6 months in advance so I can give the mine that I work in
notice that I WILL NOT be available for work duties I feel I could
just offer you a flight to my homeland and see you then. Or I could
maybe take to my tribe how I feel about meeting Mr. Ed Seykota.
|
You might consider taking
your feelings about <commitment> to your Tribe. |
|
Sun, 23 Sep
2007
Upper Trend
of Share
Sir,
i want to know about technial chart trading and upper trend of share
|
You might consider getting
someone to help you with your English. |
|
Sun, 23 Sep
2007
Learning to
Trade - Wants to Add On
Ed,
On Friday, I have mixed day and end up slightly down (a few hundred
dollars). I close out my positions on Gold and Crude Oil.
I open another
short position on the Dow Jones. The closed equity of my account, after
5 weeks of the experiment (and just 4 weeks of actual trading) is up
150% to almost $25,000 from $10,000 starting position.
I spend a
few hours today looking at the charts and try to find markets that I
might take a position in. I also give some thought to how I might add on
to positions. |
You might consider taking
your feelings of <wanting to add to positions> to your Tribe.
Sometimes the results of the
last trade make the now chart look more or less attractive.
|
|
Sun, 23 Sep
2007
Bug in TT
Chart Server
Ed.
I try to add stock charts and receive the following error. Is the
problem on my end?
Server Error in '/tribe/Charts' Application. Access to the path
d:\Hosting\seykota\tribe\
charts\export\subs\
is denied.
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of
the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more
information about the error and where it originated in the code.
|
Thank you for the catch. |
|
Sun, 23 Sep
2007
Rome Tribe
Hi,
Attached is the form to found a tribe in Roma, Italy. |

Welcome
Rome,
Italy |
|
Sun, 23 Sep
2007
Wants
Reference
Hello Ed,
I'm a member of your Tribe and I came about an interesting trader and
before making a commitment I want to check basic facts. Among many well
known people he has done (or claims to have done, that's what I check)
trading work with are a broker of Livermore and you.
[Name] says "I was taught by Ed Seykota to learn how to breathe
properly once a week. I would go over to his house or he would come over
to mine on a Saturday and we would spend the day doing deep breathing
and eating fruit."
Is this basically correct? |
Note: FAQ does not endorse people or
commercial products. See Ground Rules.
The story does not ring a bell.
|
|
Sun, 23 Sep
2007
Curve Fitting Fear #2
see
previous
Ed Says: You can determine answers to back-testing
questions by back testing.
Could you elaborate on that? |
Yes. If you have questions
about back tests, you can find out answers by running your own back
tests. |
|
Sun, 23 Sep
2007
Curve Fitting Fear
see
previous
Ed Says: Part of your system is the
math. Another part is your willingness to follow the math when you don't
feel like it.
I would like to trade only FOREX majors. The part I don't like of this
mathematical reasoning is that I can come up with (in back-testing) a
very good system profitable on a highly diversified market, or on a few FOREX markets only. But not on both.
I am afraid the latter (only on FOREX) is curve fitted. |
You might consider taking your
feelings of <not liking the reasoning> and <fear of curve fitting> to
you Tribe as entry points.
You can determine answers to
back testing questions by back testing. |
|
Sat, 22 Sep
2007
Trading and Rocket Science
Ed,
Do you think that one has to be a rocket scientist to be
a good trader and make consistent profits over the long run?
Certainly trend following principles are very simple.
However it looks like most of today's managers devote a lot of resources
on statistical research and also methods to reduce model risk or equity
curve volatility, such as using multi-model approaches.
I think they are taking advantage of today's massive
computational resources. Although I think that this won't change the
nature of markets or trend following itself for that matter, I feel that
a lot of these managers might also qualify to work as rocket scientists.
Even you might work as a rocket scientist. What do you think?
Now, what's your take on curve fitting? See this quotation of Ralph
Vince:
The key to
ensuring that you have a positive mathematical expectation in the
future is to not restrict your system's degrees of freedom. You want
to keep your system's degrees of freedom as high as possible to
ensure the positive mathematical expectation in the future. This is
accomplished not only by eliminating, or at least minimizing, the
number of optimizable parameters, but also by eliminating, or at
least minimizing, as many of the system rules as possible.
Every parameter you add, every rule you add, every
little adjustment and qualification you add to your system
diminishes its degrees of freedom. Ideally, you will have a system
that is very primitive and simple, and that continually grinds out
marginal profits over time in almost all the different markets.
Again, it is important that you realize that it really doesn't
matter how profitable the system is, so long as it is profitable.
The money you will make trading will be made by how effective the
money management you employ is.
The trading system is simply a vehicle to give you a
positive mathematical expectation on which to use money management.
Systems that work (show at least a marginal profit) on only one or a
few markets, or have different rules or parameters for different
markets, probably won't work real-time for very long.
The problem with most technically oriented traders is
that they spend too much time and effort having the computer crank
out run after run of different rules and parameter values for
trading systems. This is the ultimate "woulda, shoulda, coulda"
game.
It is completely counterproductive. Rather than
concentrating your efforts and computer time toward maximizing your
trading system profits, direct the energy toward maximizing the
certainty level of a marginal profit.
If his assertion is true, then consistent profitable long-term trend
following trading is only viable in a highly diversified portfolio. How
I see this: let's take the example of the simple support and resistance
trading system of TSP, or even a Donchian one, or a variation of these
two working with two trends and also ATR-adjusted stops.
Let's assume we back tested the system on the Silver
market back in 1991. Whatever parameters we found to be "optimal" and
even the system being a robust one, we would certainly make no money
(likely blow or bleed out) in the next 10 years following 1991 given the
lack of meaningful trends in that market.
The conclusion I come to is that portfolio selection can be very risky.
Trend following basic assumption is the recurrence of market trends. The
fewer the markets I trade the more I will be exposed to the risk of
variable, suboptimal or even negative performance. In a highly
diversified portfolio the greater is the likelihood of meaningful price
trends occurring in some of the portfolio markets at all times. |
Part of your system is the math.
Another part is your willingness to follow the math when you don't feel
like it.

The Best Math
requires step-wise integration
Clip:
http://www.art.com/asp/sp-asp
/_/pd-10280531/Persistence.htm |
|
Fri, 21 Sep
2007
Euler's Constant
Ed
I have been looking over the part on 'trend' in the Trading System
Project section of the website. I was fascinated with Euler and his
constant .5772 etc. etc. to millions of decimal places these days. I am
trying to understand it better, but don't quite understand its
connection to calculating a function to determine the strength of
different markets. I am missing some fundamental connection here.
Is there some further reading or exercise you recommend to help me
increase my ability to use the Euler-Mascheroni constant in problem
solving?
Thanks |
Euler's constant, e, shows up in
many places in math and science.
In trading, if you compute a
trailing exponential average, and if the price steps from A to B, then
the exponential average, P, follows the form
P = A + (B-A) e-(t/T)
| |